Privacy
California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA)
Intercepting or recording a communication, or aiding someone else to do so, without the consent of all parties.
Pleaded in 14 of the 98 matters on this docket
Governing law
Cal. Penal Code 630 et seq. — section 631 (wiretapping and aiding interception), section 632 (confidential communications), section 632.7 (cellular and cordless calls); civil remedy at section 637.2
Damages
Section 637.2 provides the greater of $5,000 per violation or three times actual damages, plus injunctive relief. A plaintiff need not have suffered actual damage to bring the action.
Limitations period
Generally one year for the statutory penalty under Cal. Civ. Proc. Code 340(a), though courts have split: some apply the three-year period of section 338(a) for a liability created by statute. Treat the shorter period as the operating assumption.
Reference material about publicly available law, current as of the date this file was compiled. It is not legal advice and it does not describe anyone’s particular situation. Statutes and limitations periods vary by jurisdiction and change.
Matters pleading this claim
Otter.ai Wiretapping
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California · 5:25-cv-06911-EKL
Otter Notetaker / OtterPilot AI meeting transcription bot joining Zoom, Google Meet and Teams calls
Filed 2025-08-15 · Class Action
ActiveAmbriz v. Google (CCAI)
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California · 3:23-cv-05437-RFL
Google Cloud Contact Center AI (CCAI) real-time call transcription and sentiment analysis
Filed 2023-10-23 · Class Action
DiscoveryIn re BetterHelp
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California · 3:23-cv-01033-RS
Meta Pixel, Snap, Pinterest and Criteo advertising tags on BetterHelp intake flow
Filed 2023-03-07 · Class Action
ActiveUnconfirmedMeta Pixel Healthcare
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California · 3:22-cv-03580-WHO
Meta Pixel / Facebook tracking code on hospital and provider websites and patient portals
Filed 2022-06-17 · Class Action
ActiveBrown v. Google (Incognito)
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California · 4:20-cv-03664-YGR
Google Chrome Incognito mode; Google Analytics, Ad Manager and other Google tags on third-party sites
Filed 2020-06 · Class Action
SettledUnconfirmedDoe v. GoodRx
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California · 3:23-cv-00501-AMO
Meta Pixel, Google Analytics/Ads tags and Criteo tags on GoodRx web and mobile properties
Filing date not established · Class Action
ActiveKatz-Lacabe v. Oracle
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (settlement affirmed by the Ninth Circuit) · 3:22-cv-04792-RS (N.D. Cal.); No. 24-7648 (9th Cir.)
Oracle Advertising / Data Cloud — third-party cookies, device identifiers, embedded widgets and purchased broker data assembled into consumer profiles
Filing date not established · Class Action
SettledCalhoun v. Google
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (Ninth Circuit on appeal) · 4:20-cv-05146-YGR (N.D. Cal.); No. 22-16993 (9th Cir.)
Google Chrome browser; Google Analytics and Ad Manager code on third-party sites
Filing date not established · Class Action
ActiveGoogle RTB
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California · 4:21-cv-02155-YGR
Google Real-Time Bidding (RTB) programmatic advertising exchange / Authorized Buyers
Filing date not established · Class Action
SettledLopez v. Apple (Siri)
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California · 4:19-cv-04577-JSW
Apple Siri voice assistant on iPhone, HomePod, Apple Watch and other Siri-enabled devices
Filing date not established · Class Action
SettledGoogle Assistant
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California · 19-cv-04286 (N.D. Cal.)
Google Assistant on Google Home, Nest, Pixel and other Assistant-enabled devices
Filing date not established · Class Action
SettledFrasco v. Flo Health
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California · 3:21-cv-00757-JD
Meta, Google Firebase/Analytics and Flurry SDKs embedded in the Flo period and ovulation tracking app
Filing date not established · Class Action
ActiveMikulsky v. Bloomingdale's
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (on appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California)
Third-party session-replay software embedded on a retail e-commerce website
Filing date not established · Class Action
ActiveJones v. Peloton
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California · 3:23-cv-01082-L-BGS
Third-party AI-powered website chat software (Drift) embedded on Peloton's customer-facing site
Filing date not established · Class Action
Active