Skip to content

Class Action

Louis v. SafeRent

SettledClass claims present

Louis, et al. v. SafeRent Solutions, LLC, et al.

Where it stands

Final approval entered November 20, 2024. Total $2.275 million, of which up to $1.175 million goes to the class, $1.1 million to attorneys' fees, and $10,000 service awards per named plaintiff. A state consumer protection claim was dismissed at summary judgment.

Key ruling

Five-year injunctive relief: SafeRent must stop issuing automated approve/decline recommendations for housing-voucher applicants unless independent fair-housing experts validate the model for fairness, and must otherwise supply underlying background data only, plus train landlord clients on the model's limitations. This is the leading U.S. settlement addressing algorithmic tenant screening.

Note on this record

Counsel list is partially verified; named individual attorneys include Christine E. Webber, Brian C. Corman, Stuart T. Rossman and Todd S. Kaplan.

The record

Court
U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Case number
1:22-cv-10800
Filed
2022-05-25
Defendants
SafeRent Solutions, LLC · Metropolitan Management Group, LLC
Plaintiffs
Two settlement classes of Black and Hispanic rental applicants who used housing choice vouchers and received a SafeRent score-based denial
Technology at issue
SafeRent 'Registry ScorePLUS' tenant-screening algorithm producing a 200–800 applicant score used by landlords for automated approve/decline recommendations
Relief sought
Damages and injunctive relief under the federal Fair Housing Act (disparate impact) and Massachusetts civil rights and consumer protection law, on the theory that the model overweighted credit history and non-tenancy debt while ignoring the guaranteed portion of income provided by federal housing vouchers.
Settlement
$2,275,000
Counsel of record
National Consumer Law Center · Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC · Greater Boston Legal Services

Claims pleaded

Sources (2)

This page describes a publicly filed case. This site is not counsel on this matter, nothing here is legal advice, and the allegations described are allegations unless a court has said otherwise.

Back to the docketClaim encyclopedia