Class action investigations in New Jersey
We are not currently accepting claimant information from New Jersey. That is a decision about where this operation is set up to work, not a statement about the merits of anyone's situation.
Why: New Jersey has not been approved for intake by the supervising attorney.
The rules that apply here
A 2017 joint opinion of the Committee on Attorney Advertising, ACPE and UPL Committee held that a for-profit platform's percentage or flat marketing fee taken from the client payment is impermissible fee-splitting with a nonlawyer and an unlawful payment for a referral, implicating RPC 5.4 and 7.2/7.3.
Authority: N.J. Joint Opinion (CAA/ACPE/UPL, 2017); N.J. RPC 5.4, 7.2, 7.3
Attorney advertising. This page is information about legal matters under investigation. It is not legal advice, and reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.